Larry Silverstein Conspiracy DEBUNKED

Larry Silverstein Conspiracy Debunked

1 – WTC towers were NEVER sold!! NEVER!!
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, who built the first tower back in 1971, still OWNS the site and the property TO THIS DAY!! The property has been given for lease due to the below mentioned reasons.

**During the 1990s, New York was suffering from the effects of the 1987 stock market crash(Black Monday 1987), which led to high vacancy rates at the World Trade Center. George Pataki became Governor of New York in 1995 on a campaign of cutting costs, including privatizing the World Trade Center. A sale of the property was considered too complex, so it was decided by the Port Authority to open a 99-year lease to COMPETITIVE bidding.


**Silverstein was born in Brooklyn(New York), and became involved in real estate, together with his father, establishing Silverstein Properties. Silverstein separated from his business partner, Bernard Mendik, in 1977, and bought a number of large office buildings in Midtown and Lower Manhattan in the late 1970s. Silverstein won a bid, **IN 1980**, from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to construct 7 World Trade Center, to the north of the World Trade Center site. Silverstein was interested in acquiring the entire World Trade Center complex, and put in a bid when the Port Authority put it up for lease in 2000.[IT WAS NOT AS IF THIS MAN, LARRY SILVERSTEIN, CAME TO NEW YORK AND SAW THE WTC TOWERS FOR THE FIRST TIME 2000/2001 FOR BIDDING…HE WAS FROM NEW YORK AND WAS IN REAL ESTATE FOR DECADES!!]

Then In January 2001, Silverstein, via Silverstein Properties and Westfield America, made a $3.2 billion bid for the lease to the World Trade Center. Silverstein was outbid by $30 million by Vornado Realty, with Boston Properties and Brookfield Properties also competing for the lease. However, Vornado withdrew and Silverstein’s bid for the lease to the World Trade Center was accepted on July 24, 2001. This was the first time in the building’s 31-year history that the complex had changed management.[CHANGE OF MANAGEMENT, NOT PROPERTY RIGHTS]

**HE ALWAYS OWNED THE BUILDING 7(since his company built it), BUT TOOK TOWERS 1, 2 , 4 AND 5 LATER, ONLY ON LEASE!!


**2 – There was no specific “terrorist clause” in the insurance policies( which “FORTUITOUSLY covered the attack” and GAVE HIM BILLIONS OF DOLLARS FROM INSURANCE COMPANIES), BUT the terms include that the damages are COVERED IN CASE OF THE DESTRUCTION OF THE PROPERTY!! HOWEVER ACCORDING TO THE commercial building insurance, the terms of the policy requires that he use the money for the REBUILDING PURPOSES. MOVER OVER, he has to PAY RENT on buildings that no longer exist in order to retain his building rights.(WHICH, BY THE WAY, is $102 MILLION ANNUALLY in BASE RENT!!)


[Finance and insurance if a typical loophole finding game and Larry Silverstein’s lawyers played the game well!!]

**The TERMS of the lease gave Silverstein, as leaseholder, the right and the OBLIGATION to rebuild the structures if destroyed.

SO WITH THE MONEY, which you believe that he is enjoying now, he MUST[OUGHT TO] build the those structures back, which is being carried out now!!


3 – “Controlled Demolition” conspiracy: The NIST(National Institute of Standards and Technology) report found no evidence supporting conspiracy theories that 7 World Trade Center was brought down by controlled demolition. Specifically, the window breakage pattern and blast sounds that would have resulted from the use of explosives were not observed. The suggestion that an incendiary material such as thermite was used instead of explosives was considered unlikely by NIST because of observations of the fire and the building’s structural response to the fire, and because it is unlikely the necessary quantity of material could have been planted without discovery.[]

The falling debris from the twin towers, combined with fires that the debris initiated in several surrounding buildings(Not just the buildings Larry Silverstein owns and has on lease), led to the partial or complete collapse of all the other buildings in the complex and caused catastrophic damage to ten other large structures in the surrounding area.

**ABOVE ALL, The insurance companies never had issues with covering the damages from the attack, (WHY DID THEY NOT FIGHT SAYING IT IS A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION, AND A CONSPIRACY FOR MONEY) but the parties had a dispute ONLY over the definition of “occurrence”, as 2 different strikes were carried out with 2 different planes[]!! Whether the settlement would be for $3.6 Billion or $7.1 Billions, as both parties interpreted the definition in their own ways…and the COURT(law) settled it for $4.55 Billions!!

Do you really wanna say, the INSURANCE COMPANIES, AFTER THROUGH VERIFICATION AND INVESTIGATION(paying BILLIONS) would not have fought back and refused to pay insurance if it was a planned and CONTROLLED DEMOLITION?!!!


4 – AND finally what businessman with sane mind would not have an insurance which would cover such an attack, WHILE DEALING WITH A BUILDING THAT HAS BEEN A TERRORIST TARGET FOR ALMOST A DECADE!!!

*It is surprising who people refuse to recall Ramzi Yousef and want to show it off as a conspiracy by US GOVT and WEALTHY JEWS!!!

**Ramzi Yousef(nephew of senior Al-Qaeda member Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, later involved in the 2001 attacks) plotted to bring down WTC towers back in 1993 itself[1993 World Trade Center bombing]!! Hoping to kill at least 250,000 people, as a retaliation for USA’s support to Israel…

And they succeeded in 2001 finally!! Al-Qaeda itself claims responsibility for the attacks!!(OR WOULD YOU LIKE TO SAY “Osama and Al-Qaeda” never existed, just a made up fiction like MIB or X-Men??)

**Al-Qaeda’s spokesman, Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, said in a video sent to al Jazeera and broadcast in October 2001 the following: “The Americans should know that the storm of plane attacks will not abate, with God’s permission. There are thousands of the Islamic nations’ youths who are eager to die just as the Americans are eager to live.”


If conspiracy still want to say, Larry Silverstein was involved in attacks back in 1993 too for insurance benefits, why would the Al-Qaeda attack the building which Silverstein had no connection with, at the time when he had no rights or lease on those building, in 1993?!


Conclusion: After careful scrutiny of  this conspiracy theory and information support either sides, one doesn’t need to be a genius to see this is merely a case of exaggerated urban legend/internet hoax, with mixed half-truths, made by a (no disrespect intended) poorly informed conspiracy theorist or some paranoid truth-seeker or someone trying to defend/sympathizing the radical religious cult involved in the attack.

P.S: Please feel free to refute anything you find untrue or incorrect and share your views. Almost all he above mentioned information has been collected from various (unbiased and reliable) sources over the internet, but still posted only after thorough verification and research; and is true/correct/unbiased to the best of my knowledge.


5 responses to “Larry Silverstein Conspiracy DEBUNKED

  1. Pingback: Anonymous·

  2. Please explain the following: Office fires burn at 600 degrees, jet fuel around 1800 degrees. 5000 degrees pools of molten iron in the basements of the tall towers and were seen and reported by many First Responders. These pools of molten metal stayed hot for three months. Where did all that heat come from do you suppose? Zelikow in his official report never bothered even mentioning it.

  3. There are hundreds of hours of discussions, documentation and witness testimony linking high ranking officials in our country, Mossad operatives, and elite bankers, stock and insurance companies out there. If you aren’t willing to actually look into all this evidence, a ridiculously huge mountain of evidence of conspiracy and government cover-up, at least don’t be part of the problem by attempting to “debunk” one little piece of it. You either have no idea what you’re dealing with, or you know only too well. Either way your article is part of the problem.

    Start here and continue. Don’t be an ostrich. There is no point in refuting one or two points of this MASSIVE conspiracy.

  4. And why didn’t NIST address what these experts say?:

    The former head of the Fire Science Division of the government agency which claims that the World Trade Centers collapsed due to fire (the National Institute of Standards and Technology), who is one of the world’s leading fire science researchers and safety engineers, a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering (Dr. James Quintiere), called for an independent review of the World Trade Center Twin Tower collapse investigation. “I wish that there would be a peer review of this,” he said, referring to the NIST investigation. “I think all the records that NIST has assembled should be archived. I would really like to see someone else take a look at what they’ve done; both structurally and from a fire point of view. … I think the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable.

    Two professors of structural engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (Dr. Joerg Schneider and Dr. Hugo Bachmann) said that, on 9/11, World Trade Center 7 was brought down by controlled demolition (translation here ).

    Kamal S. Obeid, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering from UC Berkeley, of Fremont, California, says :

    “Photos of the steel, evidence about how the buildings collapsed, the unexplainable collapse of WTC 7, evidence of thermite in the debris as well as several other red flags, are quite troubling indications of well planned and controlled demolition”

    Ronald H. Brookman, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering from UC Davis, of Novato California, writes :

    “Why would all 47 stories of WTC 7 fall straight down to the ground in about seven seconds… ? It was not struck by any aircraft or engulfed in any fire. An independent investigation is justified for all three collapses including the surviving steel samples and the composition of the dust.”

    Graham John Inman, structural engineer, of London, England, points out :

    “WTC 7 Building could not have collapsed as a result of internal fire and external debris. NO plane hit this building. This is the only case of a steel frame building collapsing through fire in the world. The fire on this building was small & localized therefore what is the cause?”

    A Dutch demolition expert (Danny Jowenko) stated that WTC 7 was imploded

    A prominent physicist with 33 years of service for the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC (Dr. David L. Griscom) said that the official theory for why the Twin Towers and world trade center building 7 collapsed “does not match the available facts” and supports the theory that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s